<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<urlset xmlns="http://www.sitemaps.org/schemas/sitemap/0.9"
        xmlns:image="http://www.google.com/schemas/sitemap-image/1.1">
  <url>
    <loc>https://auditably.co/blog/audit-trail-emissions-data</loc>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://auditably.co/blog/images/ifrs-s2-evidence-lineage-diagram.png</image:loc>
      <image:title>IFRS S2 evidence lineage diagram</image:title>
      <image:caption>The evidence lineage behind a single Scope 2 figure. Each stage carries the timestamp it was recorded at, and the source file carries a hash taken when it was uploaded. Illustrative values.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://auditably.co/blog/images/four-evidence-tests-assurance-diagram.png</image:loc>
      <image:title>The four evidence tests an assurer applies</image:title>
      <image:caption>The four tests, in the order they are usually asked. A gap in any one of them is a finding, not a note.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://auditably.co/blog/images/append-only-audit-log-example.png</image:loc>
      <image:title>Append-only audit log example with a rejected update</image:title>
      <image:caption>An append-only log. The restatement keeps both values, and the attempt to alter the log is itself recorded as rejected. Illustrative values.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
  </url>
  <url>
    <loc>https://auditably.co/blog/issa-5000-preparers</loc>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://auditably.co/blog/images/issa-5000-preparer-evidence-requests-diagram.png</image:loc>
      <image:title>What ISSA 5000 puts on the reporting entity</image:title>
      <image:caption>The standard binds the practitioner. These four are what reach the reporting entity as requests.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://auditably.co/blog/images/limited-vs-reasonable-assurance-comparison.png</image:loc>
      <image:title>Limited and reasonable assurance compared</image:title>
      <image:caption>Both levels sit inside ISSA 5000. Neither provides absolute assurance, and both need the evidence to exist before fieldwork begins.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
  </url>
  <url>
    <loc>https://auditably.co/blog/bursa-nsrf-group-2-fy2026</loc>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://auditably.co/blog/images/bursa-nsrf-group-timeline-fy2025-fy2027.png</image:loc>
      <image:title>Malaysia NSRF reporting timeline FY2025 to FY2027</image:title>
      <image:caption>Reporting cohorts under the NSRF. The assurance bar is drawn dashed because it is an aim subject to further consultation, not a settled requirement.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://auditably.co/blog/images/nsrf-group-2-readiness-checklist-diagram.png</image:loc>
      <image:title>NSRF Group 2 FY2026 readiness requirements</image:title>
      <image:caption>What a Group 2 reporter needs in place for FY2026. Transition relief narrows the scope of disclosure, not the standard of evidence behind what you do disclose.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
  </url>
  <url>
    <loc>https://auditably.co/blog/who-signs-off-climate-disclosure</loc>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://auditably.co/blog/images/preparer-reviewer-approver-workflow-diagram.png</image:loc>
      <image:title>Preparer, reviewer and approver workflow</image:title>
      <image:caption>Three roles, three different questions. When one person performs all three, the control does not exist regardless of what the process document says.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://auditably.co/blog/images/climate-disclosure-sign-off-record-anatomy.png</image:loc>
      <image:title>Anatomy of a climate disclosure sign-off record</image:title>
      <image:caption>The anatomy of a sign-off worth the name. The example row is illustrative.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
  </url>
  <url>
    <loc>https://auditably.co/blog/ifrs-s2-ghg-amendments-2025</loc>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://auditably.co/blog/images/ifrs-s2-december-2025-amendments-summary-diagram.png</image:loc>
      <image:title>December 2025 IFRS S2 amendments summary</image:title>
      <image:caption>The four targeted amendments. Each is a relief, and each leaves something behind that has to be documented.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://auditably.co/blog/images/category-15-financed-emissions-subtotal-diagram.png</image:loc>
      <image:title>Category 15 financed emissions subtotal condition</image:title>
      <image:caption>The Category 15 relief is conditional. Including Category 15 in your Scope 3 measure triggers a subtotal requirement.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
  </url>
  <url>
    <loc>https://auditably.co/blog/spreadsheets-ifrs-s2-controls</loc>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://auditably.co/blog/images/spreadsheet-calculation-vs-control-boundary-diagram.png</image:loc>
      <image:title>Spreadsheet calculation versus disclosure control boundary</image:title>
      <image:caption>A boundary, not a verdict. Most reporting teams need both sides; the mistake is assuming one covers the other.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://auditably.co/blog/images/excel-round-trip-change-logged-diagram.png</image:loc>
      <image:title>Excel round trip with the change recorded</image:title>
      <image:caption>Keeping the spreadsheet and adding the control layer. The figures shown are illustrative.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
  </url>
  <url>
    <loc>https://auditably.co/blog/limited-vs-reasonable-assurance</loc>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://auditably.co/blog/images/limited-vs-reasonable-assurance-comparison.png</image:loc>
      <image:title>Limited and reasonable assurance compared</image:title>
      <image:caption>Both levels sit inside ISSA 5000. Neither provides absolute assurance, and both need the evidence to exist before fieldwork begins.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://auditably.co/blog/images/assurance-evidence-depth-ladder-diagram.png</image:loc>
      <image:title>Assurance evidence depth ladder</image:title>
      <image:caption>Each rung costs you more preparation than the one below it. Moving to reasonable assurance means the top rung is in scope.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
  </url>
  <url>
    <loc>https://auditably.co/blog/reproducing-emissions-figures</loc>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://auditably.co/blog/images/reproduce-emissions-figure-inputs-diagram.png</image:loc>
      <image:title>Inputs required to reproduce an emissions figure</image:title>
      <image:caption>Everything needed to rebuild a figure, retained rather than remembered. The factor version is the one that usually goes missing.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://auditably.co/blog/images/emission-factor-version-trail-diagram.png</image:loc>
      <image:title>Emission factor version trail</image:title>
      <image:caption>Same consumption, same method, two factor releases, two answers. Neither is wrong. Illustrative values.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
  </url>
</urlset>
