<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<urlset xmlns="http://www.sitemaps.org/schemas/sitemap/0.9"
        xmlns:image="http://www.google.com/schemas/sitemap-image/1.1">
  <url>
    <loc>https://auditably.co/blog/audit-trail-emissions-data</loc>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://auditably.co/blog/images/ifrs-s2-evidence-lineage-diagram.png</image:loc>
      <image:title>IFRS S2 evidence lineage diagram</image:title>
      <image:caption>The evidence lineage behind a single Scope 2 figure. Each stage carries the timestamp it was recorded at, and the source file carries a hash taken when it was uploaded. Illustrative values.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://auditably.co/blog/images/four-evidence-tests-assurance-diagram.png</image:loc>
      <image:title>The four evidence tests an assurer applies</image:title>
      <image:caption>The four tests, in the order they are usually asked. A gap in any one of them is a finding, not a note.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://auditably.co/blog/images/append-only-audit-log-example.png</image:loc>
      <image:title>Append-only audit log example with a rejected update</image:title>
      <image:caption>An append-only log. The restatement keeps both values, and the attempt to alter the log is itself recorded as rejected. Illustrative values.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
  </url>
  <url>
    <loc>https://auditably.co/blog/ifrs-s2-reporting-software-evaluation</loc>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://auditably.co/blog/images/ifrs-s2-reporting-software-evaluation-cover.png</image:loc>
      <image:title>How to evaluate IFRS S2 reporting software</image:title>
      <image:caption>Practitioner Guide. We sell one of the products in this category; the disclosure is at the end.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://auditably.co/blog/images/ifrs-s2-software-evaluation-criteria-matrix.png</image:loc>
      <image:title>IFRS S2 software evaluation criteria</image:title>
      <image:caption>Seven criteria and the specific failure each one catches. Score a vendor against all seven rather than on demo quality.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://auditably.co/blog/images/erp-vs-ifrs-s2-disclosure-tool-boundary.png</image:loc>
      <image:title>ERP versus IFRS S2 disclosure tool</image:title>
      <image:caption>Adjacent problems, not the same problem. Many groups need both.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://auditably.co/blog/images/ifrs-s2-vendor-rfp-question-checklist.png</image:loc>
      <image:title>IFRS S2 vendor RFP question checklist</image:title>
      <image:caption>Ask for these in the RFP response or the contract, not in the demo. Answers given verbally are not answers.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
  </url>
  <url>
    <loc>https://auditably.co/blog/assurance-ready-reporting-software</loc>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://auditably.co/blog/images/assurance-ready-reporting-software-cover.png</image:loc>
      <image:title>Assurance readiness as a selection criterion</image:title>
      <image:caption>Practitioner Guide. Every test below can be run on a live system, including ours.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://auditably.co/blog/images/assurance-readiness-six-tests-checklist.png</image:loc>
      <image:title>Six tests for assurance readiness</image:title>
      <image:caption>Six questions to put to a vendor. Ask them to show you rather than tell you.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://auditably.co/blog/images/append-only-vs-editable-record-comparison.png</image:loc>
      <image:title>Append-only versus editable record</image:title>
      <image:caption>The difference is enforcement. A policy saying do not edit is not the same as a system that cannot.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://auditably.co/blog/images/assurance-export-contents-diagram.png</image:loc>
      <image:title>What an assurance export should contain</image:title>
      <image:caption>A PDF of the report is not an export. This is the material a practitioner can actually test.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
  </url>
  <url>
    <loc>https://auditably.co/blog/ifrs-s2-software-pricing</loc>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://auditably.co/blog/images/ifrs-s2-software-pricing-cover.png</image:loc>
      <image:title>What IFRS S2 reporting software costs</image:title>
      <image:caption>Practitioner Guide. Our own price is stated in full; no competitor price is estimated.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://auditably.co/blog/images/ifrs-s2-software-pricing-models-comparison.png</image:loc>
      <image:title>IFRS S2 software pricing models</image:title>
      <image:caption>Which model a vendor uses tells you where your cost grows in year two.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://auditably.co/blog/images/first-cycle-total-cost-breakdown.png</image:loc>
      <image:title>First cycle cost categories</image:title>
      <image:caption>Categories, not amounts. We publish our own price and decline to estimate anyone else’s.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
  </url>
  <url>
    <loc>https://auditably.co/blog/issa-5000-preparers</loc>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://auditably.co/blog/images/issa-5000-preparer-evidence-requests-diagram.png</image:loc>
      <image:title>What ISSA 5000 puts on the reporting entity</image:title>
      <image:caption>The standard binds the practitioner. These four are what reach the reporting entity as requests.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://auditably.co/blog/images/limited-vs-reasonable-assurance-comparison.png</image:loc>
      <image:title>Limited and reasonable assurance compared</image:title>
      <image:caption>Both levels sit inside ISSA 5000. Neither provides absolute assurance, and both need the evidence to exist before fieldwork begins.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
  </url>
  <url>
    <loc>https://auditably.co/blog/issa-5000-assurance-capacity</loc>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://auditably.co/blog/images/issa-5000-assurance-capacity-cover.png</image:loc>
      <image:title>Is there enough assurance capacity for ISSA 5000</image:title>
      <image:caption>Research Note. Where we have no data, we say so rather than estimating.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://auditably.co/blog/images/issa-5000-assurance-standard-transition.png</image:loc>
      <image:title>ISSA 5000 assurance standard transition</image:title>
      <image:caption>One standard replaces two, and the population of practitioners it covers gets wider.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://auditably.co/blog/images/assurance-engagement-timetable-preparer.png</image:loc>
      <image:title>Assurance engagement timetable for preparers</image:title>
      <image:caption>Illustrative sequencing, not a requirement of any standard. The six-month step is the one that cannot be rushed.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
  </url>
  <url>
    <loc>https://auditably.co/blog/limited-vs-reasonable-assurance</loc>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://auditably.co/blog/images/limited-vs-reasonable-assurance-comparison.png</image:loc>
      <image:title>Limited and reasonable assurance compared</image:title>
      <image:caption>Both levels sit inside ISSA 5000. Neither provides absolute assurance, and both need the evidence to exist before fieldwork begins.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://auditably.co/blog/images/assurance-evidence-depth-ladder-diagram.png</image:loc>
      <image:title>Assurance evidence depth ladder</image:title>
      <image:caption>Each rung costs you more preparation than the one below it. Moving to reasonable assurance means the top rung is in scope.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
  </url>
  <url>
    <loc>https://auditably.co/blog/who-signs-off-climate-disclosure</loc>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://auditably.co/blog/images/preparer-reviewer-approver-workflow-diagram.png</image:loc>
      <image:title>Preparer, reviewer and approver workflow</image:title>
      <image:caption>Three roles, three different questions. When one person performs all three, the control does not exist regardless of what the process document says.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://auditably.co/blog/images/climate-disclosure-sign-off-record-anatomy.png</image:loc>
      <image:title>Anatomy of a climate disclosure sign-off record</image:title>
      <image:caption>The anatomy of a sign-off worth the name. The example row is illustrative.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
  </url>
  <url>
    <loc>https://auditably.co/blog/sign-off-record-across-departments</loc>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://auditably.co/blog/images/sign-off-record-across-departments-cover.png</image:loc>
      <image:title>A sign-off record across five departments</image:title>
      <image:caption>Practitioner Guide. A method you can run on paper before you run it in a system.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://auditably.co/blog/images/five-departments-to-one-figure-data-flow.png</image:loc>
      <image:title>Five departments to one disclosed figure</image:title>
      <image:caption>Four handovers between the meter and the disclosure. Each one is a place evidence goes missing.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://auditably.co/blog/images/departmental-review-responsibility-matrix.png</image:loc>
      <image:title>Departmental review responsibility matrix</image:title>
      <image:caption>A reviewer must be able to say the figure is wrong. That rules out most of the chain.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://auditably.co/blog/images/ifrs-s2-sign-off-record-fields.png</image:loc>
      <image:title>Sign-off record fields</image:title>
      <image:caption>Six fields. If one is missing, the approval cannot be tested by someone who was not there.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
  </url>
  <url>
    <loc>https://auditably.co/blog/spreadsheets-ifrs-s2-controls</loc>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://auditably.co/blog/images/spreadsheet-calculation-vs-control-boundary-diagram.png</image:loc>
      <image:title>Spreadsheet calculation versus disclosure control boundary</image:title>
      <image:caption>A boundary, not a verdict. Most reporting teams need both sides; the mistake is assuming one covers the other.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://auditably.co/blog/images/excel-round-trip-change-logged-diagram.png</image:loc>
      <image:title>Excel round trip with the change recorded</image:title>
      <image:caption>Keeping the spreadsheet and adding the control layer. The figures shown are illustrative.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
  </url>
  <url>
    <loc>https://auditably.co/blog/reproducing-emissions-figures</loc>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://auditably.co/blog/images/reproduce-emissions-figure-inputs-diagram.png</image:loc>
      <image:title>Inputs required to reproduce an emissions figure</image:title>
      <image:caption>Everything needed to rebuild a figure, retained rather than remembered. The factor version is the one that usually goes missing.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://auditably.co/blog/images/emission-factor-version-trail-diagram.png</image:loc>
      <image:title>Emission factor version trail</image:title>
      <image:caption>Same consumption, same method, two factor releases, two answers. Neither is wrong. Illustrative values.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
  </url>
  <url>
    <loc>https://auditably.co/blog/consolidating-emissions-across-entities</loc>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://auditably.co/blog/images/consolidating-emissions-across-entities-cover.png</image:loc>
      <image:title>Consolidating emissions across entities</image:title>
      <image:caption>Practitioner Guide. Four failure modes, and the record that keeps each one visible.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://auditably.co/blog/images/multi-entity-consolidation-double-count-points.png</image:loc>
      <image:title>Where a group emissions figure double counts</image:title>
      <image:caption>Four double-count points, all invisible once the entities have been added together.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://auditably.co/blog/images/emission-factor-by-jurisdiction-matrix.png</image:loc>
      <image:title>Emission factors by jurisdiction</image:title>
      <image:caption>Illustrative. The consumption is identical; the disclosed number is not.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://auditably.co/blog/images/methodology-decision-record-template.png</image:loc>
      <image:title>Methodology decision record template</image:title>
      <image:caption>One record per decision, written when you make it rather than when someone asks.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
  </url>
  <url>
    <loc>https://auditably.co/blog/sox-lessons-for-climate-disclosure</loc>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://auditably.co/blog/images/sox-disclosure-controls-climate-cover.png</image:loc>
      <image:title>What SOX taught finance about disclosure controls</image:title>
      <image:caption>Technical Analysis. Sources are linked inline throughout.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://auditably.co/blog/images/sox-icfr-control-cycle-mapped-to-climate.png</image:loc>
      <image:title>ICFR control cycle mapped to climate disclosure</image:title>
      <image:caption>The ICFR cycle. Four of the five stages map onto climate disclosure. The fifth does not.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://auditably.co/blog/images/deficiency-severity-ladder.png</image:loc>
      <image:title>Control deficiency severity ladder</image:title>
      <image:caption>Definitions from PCAOB AS 2201. The severity ladder is the most portable idea in the whole framework.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://auditably.co/blog/images/sox-vs-ifrs-s2-what-transfers.png</image:loc>
      <image:title>What transfers from SOX to IFRS S2</image:title>
      <image:caption>An honest map. Roughly half the framework transfers; the legal machinery does not.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
  </url>
  <url>
    <loc>https://auditably.co/blog/climate-data-became-financial-data</loc>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://auditably.co/blog/images/climate-data-became-financial-data-cover.png</image:loc>
      <image:title>Climate data became financial data</image:title>
      <image:caption>Opinion. The structural claims are cited; the argument built on them is mine.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://auditably.co/blog/images/voluntary-report-vs-general-purpose-report.png</image:loc>
      <image:title>Voluntary report versus general purpose financial report</image:title>
      <image:caption>The same numbers, moved from one document to the other, are read under different rules.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://auditably.co/blog/images/climate-disclosure-liability-shift-diagram.png</image:loc>
      <image:title>What changed structurally in climate disclosure</image:title>
      <image:caption>Four moves, none of them about targets or ambition. All four are about where the number lives.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
  </url>
  <url>
    <loc>https://auditably.co/blog/ifrs-s2-transition-reliefs</loc>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://auditably.co/blog/images/ifrs-s2-transition-reliefs-cover.png</image:loc>
      <image:title>What IFRS S2 lets you defer in year one</image:title>
      <image:caption>Technical Analysis. Every relief below is cited to its paragraph in the standards.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://auditably.co/blog/images/ifrs-s2-transition-reliefs-first-year.png</image:loc>
      <image:title>IFRS S2 first-year transition reliefs</image:title>
      <image:caption>Five reliefs, each tied to a paragraph in the standards.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://auditably.co/blog/images/transition-reliefs-second-year-tail.png</image:loc>
      <image:title>The second-year tail of the transition reliefs</image:title>
      <image:caption>The tail relieves the comparative, never the current year.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
  </url>
  <url>
    <loc>https://auditably.co/blog/ifrs-s2-ghg-amendments-2025</loc>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://auditably.co/blog/images/ifrs-s2-december-2025-amendments-summary-diagram.png</image:loc>
      <image:title>December 2025 IFRS S2 amendments summary</image:title>
      <image:caption>The four targeted amendments. Each is a relief, and each leaves something behind that has to be documented.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://auditably.co/blog/images/category-15-financed-emissions-subtotal-diagram.png</image:loc>
      <image:title>Category 15 financed emissions subtotal condition</image:title>
      <image:caption>The Category 15 relief is conditional. Including Category 15 in your Scope 3 measure triggers a subtotal requirement.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
  </url>
  <url>
    <loc>https://auditably.co/blog/scope-3-category-15-financed-emissions</loc>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://auditably.co/blog/images/scope-3-category-15-cover.png</image:loc>
      <image:title>Category 15 after the financed emissions relief</image:title>
      <image:caption>Technical Analysis. Paragraph references are taken from the December 2025 amendments text.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://auditably.co/blog/images/scope-3-category-15-financed-emissions-boundary.png</image:loc>
      <image:title>Category 15 boundary under the 29A limitation</image:title>
      <image:caption>Paragraph 29A permits the limitation. Paragraph 29B is the price of using it.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://auditably.co/blog/images/category-15-relief-disclosure-conditions.png</image:loc>
      <image:title>Category 15 limitation disclosure conditions</image:title>
      <image:caption>Two obligations follow from taking the limitation. The third applies whenever Category 15 is included.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://auditably.co/blog/images/industry-classification-selection-requirements.png</image:loc>
      <image:title>Industry classification selection requirements</image:title>
      <image:caption>GICS is no longer the only route. What replaced it is a choice you have to justify in the report.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
  </url>
  <url>
    <loc>https://auditably.co/blog/bursa-nsrf-group-2-fy2026</loc>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://auditably.co/blog/images/bursa-nsrf-group-timeline-fy2025-fy2027.png</image:loc>
      <image:title>Malaysia NSRF reporting timeline FY2025 to FY2027</image:title>
      <image:caption>Reporting cohorts under the NSRF. The assurance bar is drawn dashed because it is an aim subject to further consultation, not a settled requirement.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://auditably.co/blog/images/nsrf-group-2-readiness-checklist-diagram.png</image:loc>
      <image:title>NSRF Group 2 FY2026 readiness requirements</image:title>
      <image:caption>What a Group 2 reporter needs in place for FY2026. Transition relief narrows the scope of disclosure, not the standard of evidence behind what you do disclose.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
  </url>
</urlset>
